The journal employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality.

• Initial Screening: All submissions are first reviewed by the Editorial Board for scope appropriateness and adherence to formatting guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria are rejected without review.

• Review Process: Manuscripts passing the initial screen are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers.

• Decision Categories:

  • Accept: No changes required.

  • Minor Revisions: Authors must address specific comments; no second full review is typically needed.

  • Major Revisions: Significant changes required; the manuscript will likely undergo a second round of review.

  • Reject: The manuscript is flawed or does not meet the journal's standards.

• Confidentiality: Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents.